The government’s modest attempt to open
up to more foreign direct Investment (FDI) might not bring In a flood
of dollars Immediately, but it is a step In the right direct ion.
The most significant measure Is to hike the ceiling for FDI in telecom from 74%
to 100%,
though Investors who want to go up to that level will still need
clearance from the government. This could see the exit of several Indian stakeholders
in telecom as valuations go up. once policy confusion is over The
limits to FIJI in
civil aviation and supermarkets remain unchanged and there Is no point allowing
more overseas investment In insurance and pension funds without legislative
action. In defence production. FDI is
restricted to 260u but, In theory, overseas investors that bring in
state of the art technology can go up to 100°,. It has been left to the
discretion of the defence ministry to decide exactly what qualifies as state of
the art, something that leaves ample scope for graft and a future scandal in
defence production units.
Today, prospective overseas inves. tors In india are spooked by the wide holes In
policy its implementation and the scope of
graft in the system. There is no point
allowing FDI In comrn mercial real
estate without putting in place a transparent policy to convert
agricultural land to commerc1a1/res1dentlal use. These powers of
conversion belong to state governments, where petty bureaucrats, brokers
and poli ticians demand huge bribes to get the conversion done.
Countries like the US and Britain. which now have powerful laws that bar their companies from bribery anywhere in the world, will soon flnd that despite Its obv ious demographic dividends, India is indeed a complex place to Invest In. WalMart is already under the scanner in the US for alleged bribery In Mexico: the probe has widened to include its Indian and Chinese operations. Just setting FDI limits higher is not enough: to get fUnds flowing, we need better and cleaner governance at all 1ev. els. That takes political resolve at the highest level, bec ause corruption In India Is systemic, rather than opport unistic. tied to how politics is funded.
No comments:
Post a Comment